Viri in literatura

Literatura

1. Adwetewa-Badu, Bemma, 2020: Poetry from Afar: Distant Reading, Global Poetics, and the Digital Humanities. Modernism / Modernity 5/1.
2. Alexander, Sam, 2019: Social Network Analysis and the Scale of Modernist Fiction, Modernism, modernity 3/4. Dostopno na: https://modernismmodernity.org/forums/posts/social-network-analysis.
3. Allington, Daniel, Brouillette, Sarah, and Golumbia, David, 2016: Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities. Los Angeles Review of Books. Dostopno na: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/.
4. Allison, Sarah, Gemma, Marissa, Heuser, Ryan, Moretti, Franco, Tevel, Amir, and Yamboliev, Irena, 2013: Style at the Scale of the Sentence. Pamphlets of the Stanford Literary Lab 5. Stanford, California: Stanford Literary Lab.
5. Anderson, Chris 2008: The End of Theory: the Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired. Dostopno na: https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
6. Anhert, Ruth, Anhert, Sebastian, Coleman, Catherine, and Weingart, Scott, 2020: The network turn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Apollon, Daniel, Bélisle, Claire, and Régnier, Philippe (ur.), 2014: Digital Critical Editions. In Haugen, Odd Einar, and Apollon, Daniel: The Digital Turn in Textual Scholarship: Historical and Typological Perspectives. Illinois: University of Illinois Press. 35–57.
8. Bailey, Moya, Cong-Huyen, Anne, Lothian, Alexis, and Phillips, Amanda, 2016: Reflections on a Movement: #transformDH, Growing Up. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Dostopno na: https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/9cf90340-7aae-4eae-bdda-45b8b4540b6b.
9. Bajt, Jan in Robnik-Šikonja, Marko, 2022: Strojna analiza tematik in sentimenta. Uporabna informatika XXX/1. 19–36.
10. Baldha, Rohan, 2021: A Study on Sentimental Analysis of Novels and Shakespeare’s Play. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 9/11. 2088–2099.
11. Barnett, Fiona, 2014: The Brave Side of Digital Humanities. Differences 25/1. 64–78.
12. Ben Blatt, 2017: Nabokov’s favorite word is Mauve. New York: Simon & Schuster.
13. Biemann, Chris, Crane, Gregory R., Fellbaum, Christiane D., and Mehler, Alexander, 2014: Computational Humanities – bridging the gap between Computer Science and Digital Humanities. Dagstuhl Reports 4/7.
14. Beveridge, Andrew and Shan, Jie, 2016: Network of Thrones. Math Horizons 23/4. 18–22.
15. Benthall, Sebastian, and Haynes, Bruce D., 2019: Racial categories in machine learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Atlanta, USA. Dostopno na: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.11668.pdf.
16. Boyd, Ryan L., Blackburn, Kate G., and Pennebaker, James W., 2020: The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis. Science advances 6/32. Dostopno na: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aba2196.
17. Caroline Levine, 2013: From Nation to Network. Victorian studies 55/4. 647–666.
18. Cheng, Jonathan Y., 2020: Fleshing Out Models of Gender in English-Language Novels (1850-2000). Journal of cultural analytics 5/1. Dostopno na: https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11652-fleshing-out-models-of-gender-in-english-language-novels-1850-2000.
19. Christen, Alessio and Spadini, Elena, 2019: Modeling genetic networks. Gustave Roud’s œuvre, from diary to poetry collections. Umanistica Digitale 3/7. 77–104.
20. Culler, Jonathan, 2010: Introduction: Critical Paradigms. PMLA: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century 125/4. 905–915.
21. Ditmajer, Nina, Ogrin, Matija, and Erjavec, Tomaž, 2019: Encoding textual variants of the early modern Slovenian poetic texts in TEI. Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino = Contributions to the contemporary history; Contributions á l’histoire contemporaine; Beiträge zur Zeitgeschichte 59/1. 10–28.
22. Dotson, Daniel, 2009: Portrayal of Physicists in Fictional Works. Comparative Literature and Culture 11/2.
23. Drucker, Johanna, 2017: Why Distant Reading Isn’t. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 132/3. 628–635.
24. Eder, Maciej, Piasecki, Maciej, and Walkowiak, Tomasz, 2017: An open stylometric system based on multilevel text analysis. Cognitive Studies/Études Cognitives 17. 1−26.
25. Eder, Maciej, 2018: Elena Ferrante: a virtual author. In Tuzzi, A. and Cortelazzo, M. A. (Eds.): Drawing Elena Ferrante’s Profile. Padova: Padova University Press. 31–45.
26. Edelstein, Dan, Findlen, Paula, Ceserani, Giovanna, Winterer, Caroline in Coleman, Nicole, 2017: AHR Forum Historical Research in a Digital Age: Reflections from the Mapping the Republic of Letters Project. American historical review 122/2. 400–424.
27. Efstathios Stamatatos, 2008: A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60/3. 538–561.
28. Elkins, Katherine and Chun, Jon, 2019: Can sentiment analysis reveal structure in a “plotless” novel? Cornell University. Dostopno na: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01441.pdf.
29. Elson, David, Dames, Nicholas, and McKeown, Kathleen, 2010: Extracting Social Networks from Literary Fiction. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics. 138–147.
30. Eve, Martin Paul, 2022: The digital humanities and literary studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Eve, Martin Paul, 2019: Close Reading with Computers Textual Scholarship, Computational Formalism, and David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
32. Fish, Stanley, 2012: Mind Your P’s and B’s: The Digital Humanities and Interpretation. New York Times. Dostopno na: https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/mind-your-ps-and-bs-the-digital-humanities-and-interpretation/.
33. Fitzpatrick, Kathleen, 2010: Reporting from the Digital Humanities 2010 Conference. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Dostopno na: https://web.archive.org/web/20190829004943/https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/reporting-from-the-digital-humanities-2010-conference/25473.
34. Flores, Leonardo, 2021: Third-Generation Electronic Literature. In O’Sullivan, James (ur.): Electronic Literature as Digital Humanities: Contexts, Forms, & Practices. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. 26–43.
35. Habjan, Jernej, 2012: The Bestseller as the Black Box of Distant Reading: The Case of Sherlock Holmes. Primerjalna književnost 35/1. 91–105.

36. Heuser, Ryan in Le-Khac, Long, 2012: A quantitative literary history of 2,958 nineteenth-century British novels: The semantic cohort method. Pamphlets of the Stanford Literary Lab 4. Dostopno na: https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet4.pdf.

37. Hladnik, Miran, 1993: Preštevna določila slovenske povesti. Slavistična revija 41/1. 65–75.
38. Hladnik, Miran, 1998: Regionalizem in slovenska književnost. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za slovanske jezike in književnosti.
39. Hladnik, Miran, 2016: Vključevanje drugega in drugačnega v slovensko literarno zgodovino. Zupan Sosič, Alojzija (ur.): Drugačno v slovenskem jeziku, literaturi in kulturi: 52. SSJLK: Zbornik predavanj. Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete. 46–53.
40. Hladnik, Miran, 2014/2016: Nova pisarija. Dostopno na: http://lit.ijs.si/pokrajin.html.Hladnik, Miran, 2014/2016: Nova pisarija: Strokovno pisanje po spletu. Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.
41. Hockey, Susan, 2000: The history of humanities computing. Schriebman, Susan, Siemens, Ray in Unsworth, John (ur.): A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell publishing. Dostopno na: https://companions.digitalhumanities.org/DH/?chapter=content/9781405103213_chapter_1.html.
42. Hui Kyong Chun, Wendy idr., 2016: The Dark Side of the Digital Humanities. Gold, Matthew K. in Klein, Lauren F. (ur.): Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 493–509.
43. Grandjean, Martin, 2015: Network visualization: mapping Shakespeare’s tragedies. Dostopno na: http://www.martingrandjean.ch/network-visualization-shakespeare/.
44. Greenfield, Patricia M., 2013: The Changing Psychology of Culture From 1800 Through 2000. Psychological Science 24/9. 1722–1731.
45. Hachmann, Gundela, 2023: Network analysis in literature and the arts: rethinking agency and creativity. JLT 17/2. 221–240.
46. Elkins, Katherine in Chun, Jon, 2019: Can sentiment analysis reveal structure in a “plotless” novel? arXiv. Dostopno na: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.01441.pdf
47. Fox, Neal P. and Ehmoda, Omran in Charniak, Eugene, 2012: Statistical Stylometrics and the Marlowe-Shakespeare Authorship Debate. Proceedings of the Georgetown University on Language and Linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University. Dostopno na: https://cs.brown.edu/research/pubs/theses/masters/2012/ehmoda.pdf.
48. Gavin, Michael, 2016: Historical Text Networks: The Sociology of Early English Criticism. Eighteenth-Century Studies 50/1. 53–80.
49. Gavin, Michael, 2016: Historical Text Networks: The Sociology of Early English Criticism. Eighteenth-Century Studies 50/1. 53–80.
50. Gessey-Jones, Thomas, Connaughton, Colm, Dunbar, Robin, and Yose, Joseph, 2020: Narrative structure of A Song of Ice and Fire creates a fictional world with realistic measures of social complexity. PNAS 117/46. 28582–28588.

51. Gottschall, Jonathan, 2008b: The ”Beauty Myth” is No Myth. Human Nature 19. 174–188.

52. Haugen, Odd Einar, and Apollon, Daniel, 2014: The Digital Turn in Textual Scholarship: Historical and Typological Perspectives. In Apollon, Daniel, Bélisle, Claire, and Régnier, Philippe (ur.): Digital Critical Editions. Illinois: University of Illinois Press. 35–57.
53. Jančič, Nika in Pribožič, Katarina, 2022: Obravnava mita lepote v delih Govekarja, Kersnika, Kvedrove in Pajkove. Jezik in slovstvo 67/1–2. 197–207.
54. Jagoda, Patrick, 2017: Literature: Networks. Dostopno na: https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-135.
55. Jockers, Matthew L. in Mimno, David, 2013: Significant themes in 19th-century literature. Poetics 41/6. 750–769.

56. Jockers, Matthew, 2013: Macroanalysis. Urbana, Chicago, Springfield: University of Illinois Press.

57. Jockers, Matthew L. in Kirilloff, Gabi, 2016: Understanding Gender and Character Agency in the 19th Century Novel. Journal of Cultural Analytics 2/2. Dostopno na: https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11066-understanding-gender-and-character-agency-in-the-19th-century-novel.

58. Juola, Patrick, 2008: Authorship attribution. Information Retrieval 1/3. 233–334.

59. Juola, Patrick, 2015: The Rowling Case: A Proposed Standard Analytic Protocol for Authorship Questions. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 30/1. 100–113.
60. Juvan, Marko, Šorli, Mojca in Žejn, Andrejka, 2021: Interpretiranje literature v zmanjšanem merilu: “oddaljeno branje” korpusa “dolgega leta 1968”. Jezik in slovstvo 66/4. 55–76, 140.
61. Kazantseva in Szpakowicz, 2010: Summarizing Short Stories. Computational Linguistics 36/1. 71–109.
62. Kearns, Edward, 2020: Annotating and quantifying narrative time disruptions in modernist and hypertext fiction. Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Narrative Understanding, Storylines, and Events. Association for Computational Linguistics. 72–77. Dostopno na: https://aclanthology.org/2020.nuse-1.9.pdf.
63. Kim, Evgeny in Klinger, Roman, 2021: A survey in sentiment and emotion analysis for computational literary studies. Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften. Erstveröffentlichung vom. Dostopno na: https://zfdg.de/2019_008.
64. Kirilloff, Gabi, Capuano, Peter J., Fredrick, Julius in Jockers, Matthew L., 2018: From a distance ‘You might mistake her for a man’: A closer reading of gender and character action in Jane Eyre, The Law and The Lady, and A Brilliant Woman. Digital Scholarship In The Humanities 33/4. 821–844.
65. Kleymann, Rabea, 2020: Softwareprototyp: Zur Theoriemündigkeit Experimenteller Software in Den Digital Humanities. In Huber, Martin (ur.): Wovon sprechen wir, wenn wir von Digitalisierung sprechen? Gehalte und Revisionen zentraler Begriffe des Digitalen. Frankfurt am Main: Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg, CompaRe. 119–138.
66. Kornai, Andras, 2013: Digital language death. PLOS ONE 8/10. 1–11.
67. Liu, Bing, 2015: Sentiment Analysis: Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Long, Hoyt in So, Richard Jean, 2016: Turbulent Flow: A Computational Model of World Literature. Modern Language Quarterly 77/3. 345-367.[
69. Lothian, Alexis, and Phillips, Amanda, 2013: Can digital humanities mean transformative critique? Journal of e-media studies 3/1. Dostopno na: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b065de73479b1fd31b2df3d275377d112077f589.
70. Marinković, Mila, 2023: Data visualizations in the “PISMA” collection: Cultural Heritage at the intersection of informatics and literary science. Tipkopis.
71. Mandell, Laure, 2016: Gendering Digital Literary History: What Counts for Digital Literary History. In Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray and Unsworth, John (ur.): A New Companion to Digital Humanities. Wiley-Blackwell. 511–523.
72. Mandić, Lucija, 2023: Kako meščanski je v resnici meščanski roman? Kvantitativna vsebinska analiza daljše slovenske pripovedne proze v dolgem 19. stoletju. Simpozij Obdobja. V tisku.
73. McGillivray, Barbara, Poibeau, Thierry, and Ruiz Fabo, Pablo, 2020: Digital Humanities and Natural Language Processing: “Je t’aime… Moi non plus”. Digital Humanities Quaterly 14/2. Dostopno na: https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/2/000454/000454.html.
74. McPherson, Tara, 2012: Why is the Digital Humanities So White?, or, Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation. In Gold, Matthew K. (ur.): Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press. 138–160.

75. Moretti, Franco, 2000a: Conjectures on World Literature”. New Left Review 1/54.

76. Moretti, Franco, 2000b: The slaughterhouse of literature. Modern Language Quarterly 61/1. 207–227.
77. Muzny, Grace, Fang, Michael, Chang, Angel in Jurafsky, Dan, 2017: A Two-stage Sieve Approach for Quote Attribution. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics. 460–470.
78. Nalisnick, Eric T. in Baird, Henry S., 2013: Character-to-Character Sentiment Analysis in Shakespeare’s Plays. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Sofia: Association for Computational Linguistics. 479–483.
79. Noble, Safiya Umoja, 2018: Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
80. Olson, Hope A., 2001: The Power to Name: Representation in Library Catalogs. Signs 26/3. 639–668.
81. Prescott, Andrew, 2023: Bias in Big Data, Machine Learning and AI: What Lessons for the Digital Humanities? Digital Humanities Quaterly 17/2. Dostopno na: https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/17/2/000689/000689.html.
82. Pennebaker, James W., 2011: The secret life of pronouns: what our words say about us. New York: Bloomsbury Press. 74–75.
83. Piper, Andrew, 2016: There Will Be Numbers. Journal of Cultural Analytics 1/1. Dostopno na: https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11062-there-will-be-numbers.
84. Piryani, Rajesh, Gupta, Vedika, Kumar Singh, Vivek, and Pinto, David, 2018: Book impact assessment: A quantitative and text-based exploratory analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology 34/5. 3101–3110.
85. Pojoga, Vlad, Neagu, Laurentiu-Marian in Dascalu, Mihai, 2020: The Character Network in Liviu Rebreanu’s Ion: A Quantitative Analysis of Dialogue. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 6/2. Dostopno na: https://www.metacriticjournal.com/article/164/the-character-network-in-liviu-rebreanus-ion-a-quantitative-analysis-of-dialogue.
86. Prescott, Andrew, 2023: Bias in Big Data, Machine Learning and AI: What Lessons for the Digital Humanities? Digital Humanities Quarterly 17/2. Dostopno na: https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/17/2/000689/000689.html
87. Rodrigo-Ruiz, Débora, 2022: Emotions in the literary text. Emotions in the literary text. A digital analysis of Cervantes’ narrative. Káñina 46/1.117–141.
88. Slodnjak, Anton. 1961. Realizem II. Legiša, Lino (ur.): Zgodovina slovenskega slovstva III. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica.
89. Stanley, David J., 2014: Computers, visualisation and history: How new technology will transform our understanding of the past. London: Routledge.
90. Ramsay, Stephen, 2011: Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

91. Rommel, Thomas, 2000: Literary Studies. Schriebman, Susan, Siemens, Ray in Unsworth, John (ur.): A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell publishing. Dostopno na: https://companions.digitalhumanities.org/DH/.

92. Sack, Graham, 2012: Character Networks for Narrative Generation. Intelligent Narrative Technologies: Papers from the 2012 AIIDE. 38.
93. Shore, Daniel, 2016: Was It for This? Influence, Archive, and Network. Modern Philology 113/3. 398-421.
94. Stern, David, 2010: The Bergen Electronic Edition of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. European Journal of Philosophy 18/3. 455–467.
95. Tanigawa, Katie, 2013: Warping the City: Joyce in a Mudbox: The Maker Lab in the Humanities (MLab). Dostopno na: https://maker.uvic.ca/about/
96. Yoshiki, Mikami, and Kodama, Shigeaki, 2012: Measuring linguistic diversity on the web. In Vannini, Laurent, and Le Crosiner, Herve (ur.): Net.Lang: Towards the Multilingual Cyberspace. Caen: C&F Editions. 121–139.
97. Vitali, Giovanni Pietro, 2018: Rethinking Rome as an Anthology: The Poeti del Trullo’s Street Poetry. Umanistica Digitale 3. 105–136.
98. Warwick, Claire, 2016: Building Theories or Theories of Building? A Tension at the Heart of Digital Humanities. Unsworth, John idr. (ur.): A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by New York: John Wiley & Sons. 538–52.
99. Weidman, Sean in Pastor, Aaren, 2021: Modernism and Gender at the Limits of Stylometry. Digital humanities quarterly. 15/4. Dostopno na: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/15/4/000566/000566.html.

100. Zehe, Albin, Becker, Martin, Hettinger, Lena, Hotho, Andreas, Reger, Isabella in Jannidis, Fotis, 2016: Prediction of Happy Endings in German Novels based on Sentiment Information. P. Cellier, T. Charnois, A. Hotho, S. Matwin, M.-F. Moens, Y. Toussaint (ur.): Proceedings of DMNLP. Riva del Garda.

101. Žejn, Andrejka, 2020: Računalniško podprta stilometrična analiza pripovedne literature Janeza Ciglerja in Christopha Schmida v slovenščini. Fluminensia 32/2. 137–158.
102. Žejn, Andrejka, 2021: Izhodišča slovenske pripovedne proze. Dvestoletna tradicija slovenske pripovedne proze: od sredine 17. do sredine 19. stoletja. Ljubljana: ZRC SAZU, Inštitut za slovensko literaturo in literarne vede. Dostopno na: https://ispp.zrc-sazu.si/kolofon/.

Viri